Drake eScholarShare
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • Drake Theses and Dissertations
    • Theses
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • Drake Theses and Dissertations
    • Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The Effects of Differential Autoshaping and Autoshaping on Key Pressing Antecedents in Retarded Individuals

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    dt1979GNH.pdf (2.7 Mb)

    Date
    1979-03
    Author
    Hight, Gregory N.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Subject
     Autoshaping (Psychology); People with Mental Disabilites 
    Abstract
    The problem. To investigate the effects of a differential autoshaping procedure as a means by which errorless visual discrimination might be acquired by retarded adults with the key press as the dependent variable. Procedure. The four participants were exposed to either a differential autoshaping procedure or an autoshaping procedure in which: (1) two orthogonal stimuli were sequentially projected onto a translucent Plexiglas key with one of the stimuli always paired with food and one of the stimuli never paired with food (differential autoshaping); or (2) one stimulus was repeatedly projected and always paired with food (autoshaping). Various experimental conditions and modifications of the standard autoshaping procedures were introduced to maximize the probability of autoshaped acquisition and to identify the nature of the operating contingencies. Findings. The differential autoshaping and autoshaping procedures did not generate key pressing; it was therefore impossible to assess the extent to which differential autoshaping served as an errorless procedure for differential key pressing. The antecedents of key pressing were sensitive to an adventitious response-reinforcer relation in one participant, while these behaviors were not affected by either stimulus-reinforcer or response-reinforcer relations in the other three participants. Conolusions. Key pressing, differential or non-differential, did not obtain as a function of a stimulus-reinforcer relation because of possible histories of punishment contingent upon explorative behavior, insufficiently intrusive stimuli, and differential stimulus intensities. The adventitious behavior developed by one of the participants points up a deficiency that exists in the literature's clarification of the relative control exerted by response-reinforcer and stimulus-reinforcer relations in the autoshaping paradigm. Reconmendations. Future research should clarify the relative control exerted by response-reinforcer and stimulus-reinforcer relations in the behavior of infra-human species and identify the relevant controlling parameters of autoshaping in non-retarded human subjects.
    Description
    49 leaves. Advisor: William D. Klipec
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/2092/760
    Collections
    • Theses

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login
    DSpace software Copyright © 2014  Duraspace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback