Drake eScholarShare
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • Drake Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • Drake Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Perceptions of Faculty and Drop-Outs of the Supportive Environment within a Post-Secondary Vocational Program

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    dd1982jer.pdf (7.3 Mb)

    Date
    1982-05
    Author
    Roberts, Joan Ellen
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Subject
     Community colleges--Vocational guidance; College drop-outs 
    Abstract
    The Problem. The problem of this study was to document the perceptions of drop~outs regarding the supportive and non-supportive community college environment, and to examine the self-reported behaviors of the vocational instructors for factors which may discriminate against special needs students. Procedure. Vocational instructors in three Iowa community colleges were surveyed. The response rate ranged from 40 percent to 77.5 percent. Fifty-nine students from the three institutions who dropped or changed vocational programs during the 1980-81 school year were interviewed about their perceptions of the support services, drop reasons, and recommended changes to improve retention. Findings. The instructors felt that students drop programs because of course difficulty, home/work responsibilities, and financial problems. Their most frequent recommendations were for more tutorial help, more help with student problems, and more financial aid. Their responses indicated that they view the characteristics of handicapped and disadvantaged students significantly different from those of nonhandicapped and non-disadvantaged students. The students reported dropping because of home/work responsibilities, inappropriate courses, course difficulties, and financial problems. The changes they most frequently recommended were: more financial aid, better schedules, different instructional methods, and more tutorial help. Conclusions. There was no institution-wide discrimination toward special needs students, but evidence did exist at the individual level. Half of the instructor respondents felt course objectives limited the participation of handicapped and disadvantaged students and only slightly more than half felt the institution provided adequate support services for special needs students. Students identified institutional changes to aid in retention. Recommendations. There should be similar studies of the other Iowa community colleges. There is a need for inservice programs for vocational instructors to help them become more supportive of special needs students.
    Description
    viii, 157 leaves. Advisor: Raymond Hock.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/2092/729
    Collections
    • Dissertations

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login
    DSpace software Copyright © 2014  Duraspace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback