Zoning Bias II: A Study of Oregon's Zoning Commission Composition Restrictions
dc.contributor.author | Anderson, Jerry L. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-04-06T15:32:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2007-04-06T15:32:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 38 Urban Lawyer 63 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2092/531 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article summarizes an empirical survey of Oregon planning commissions, to determine whether Oregon's occupational restrictions on commission appointments are working. An earlier survey found that zoning boards in Iowa were heavily populated with white-collar occupations, with many having a direct or indirect connection to land development work. Oregon's occupational restrictions appear to have reduced the number of appointees who are tied to development, but the commissions are still skewed toward white-collar representation. The article concludes that legal restrictions should be tightened to achieve the goal of broader occupational distribution. | en |
dc.format.extent | 415870 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | American Bar Association | en |
dc.subject | zoning | en |
dc.subject | urban planning | en |
dc.title | Zoning Bias II: A Study of Oregon's Zoning Commission Composition Restrictions | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Faculty publications
Publications and research submitted by the faculty members of the Law School.