Concurrent Schedule Performance with Young Infants

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record Bonem, Elliott J. 2007-12-14T16:54:21Z 2007-12-14T16:54:21Z 1980-10
dc.identifier.other 1980 .B641
dc.description 35 leaves. Advisor: Larry A. Alferink. en
dc.description.abstract The problem: In operant research on infant conditioning, extinction sessions often are conducted in demonstrating schedule control over the response. However, extinction sessions are often accompanied by disruptive behaviors which terminate experimental sessions. Concurrent reinforcement schedules provide a methodology for demonstrating schedule control over the response without relying on extinction sessions. The purpose of this study is to determine whether infant responding can be acquired, maintained, and systematically controlled by concurrent reinforcement schedule contingencies. Procedure. During daily sessions, three young infants were exposed to several concurrent variable-interval schedules. A mobile rotation, contingent on a foot kick, was occasionally available on each schedule component. Head turns served as the changeover response. Relative time allocation was assessed as was matching between the logarithm of time (and response) ratios and log-reinforcement ratios. Findings. Without relying on extinction sessions, schedule control was demonstrated for all infants. The proportion of time spent in a given schedule component systematically varied as the programmed availability of contingent mobile movement was varied. By tending to allocate responses and time equally between the two schedule components, irrespective of programmed reinforcement, all infants undermatched and showed a positive bias for the richer schedule component. Conclusion. Concurrent reinforcement schedules provide a methodology for demonstrating systematic control over infant responding. Although the matching relationship seems to generalize to young infants, the variables which are the source of undermatching and bias have not been identified. Recommendations. To gain better experimental control over infant responding, the sources of bias and undermatching must be identified. For example, future research could determine whether bias results from using qualitatively different reinforcers, or whether better matching results from incorporating a changeover delay. en
dc.format.extent 1720986 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher Drake University en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Drake University, School of Graduate Studies;1980
dc.subject Psychology en
dc.subject Babies--Behavior en
dc.title Concurrent Schedule Performance with Young Infants en
dc.type Thesis en

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search


My Account