Evaluating the Superintendent in Iowa

dc.contributor.author	Kerr, Joyce Annete
dc.date.accessioned	2007-12-14T16:51:46Z
dc.date.available	2007-12-14T16:51:46Z
dc.date.issued	1994-05
dc.identifier.other	1994 .K463
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2092/696
dc.description	iv, 56 leaves. Advisor: Edward R. Ducharme	en
dc.description.abstract	Superintendent evaluative instruments used by Iowa's largest school districts have common methods and criteria which do not reflect the unique circumstances and needs of each district. A data analysis of the criteria and methods to evaluate the superintendents was conducted. The findings show the superintendent evaluative instruments have less of a variety of methods than on types of methods used nationally. Iowa school districts use similar criteria to evaluate superintendents, and similar methods for this evaluative procedure. However, this study shows a strong similarity between the criteria and methods used in Iowa Association of School Boards' sample form and the criteria and methods used in Iowa school districts' instruments to evaluate the superintendents. Further study needs to be done, including all of Iowa's school districts to bring more validity to this study.	en
dc.format.extent	2578277 bytes
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf
dc.language.iso	en_US
dc.publisher	Drake University	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Drake University, School of Education;1994
dc.subject	School superintendents--Evaluation--Iowa	en
dc.subject	School administrators--Evaluation--Iowa	en
dc.title	Evaluating the Superintendent in Iowa	en
dc.type	Thesis	en