Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKerr, Joyce Annete
dc.date.accessioned2007-12-14T16:51:46Z
dc.date.available2007-12-14T16:51:46Z
dc.date.issued1994-05
dc.identifier.other1994 .K463
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2092/696
dc.descriptioniv, 56 leaves. Advisor: Edward R. Ducharmeen
dc.description.abstractSuperintendent evaluative instruments used by Iowa's largest school districts have common methods and criteria which do not reflect the unique circumstances and needs of each district. A data analysis of the criteria and methods to evaluate the superintendents was conducted. The findings show the superintendent evaluative instruments have less of a variety of methods than on types of methods used nationally. Iowa school districts use similar criteria to evaluate superintendents, and similar methods for this evaluative procedure. However, this study shows a strong similarity between the criteria and methods used in Iowa Association of School Boards' sample form and the criteria and methods used in Iowa school districts' instruments to evaluate the superintendents. Further study needs to be done, including all of Iowa's school districts to bring more validity to this study.en
dc.format.extent2578277 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherDrake Universityen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDrake University, School of Education;1994
dc.subjectSchool superintendents--Evaluation--Iowaen
dc.subjectSchool administrators--Evaluation--Iowaen
dc.titleEvaluating the Superintendent in Iowaen
dc.typeThesisen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record