Integrated Marketing Communications : The Public Relations Perspective

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Fiene, Scott A.
dc.date.accessioned 2007-11-16T19:37:04Z
dc.date.available 2007-11-16T19:37:04Z
dc.date.issued 1992-12
dc.identifier.other 1992 .F462
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2092/684
dc.description 103 leaves. Advisor: Lou Wolter en
dc.description.abstract Several studies have examined integrated marketing communications from an advertising and marketing perspective, but little has been done from the public relations perspective. This research sought to determine the opinions public relations practitioners have about integrated marketing communications, and to find out if they integrate their public relations. In June, 1992, 533 surveys were mailed to public relations agency practitioners, corporate practitioners. and educators. There were 175 responses. Public relations agency practitioners were most familiar with, and most supportive of, integrated marketing communications. They were also most likely to say it was cost effective, was beneficial, was driven by client needs. and was the "way of the future." Nearly all said they helped clients integrate their public relations. Public relations educators were almost as familiar with the concept as agency practitioners, but they showed the least enthusiasm and support for it. Only half said their public relations curriculum was integrated with other communications disciplines, and they were less likely to feel integration was driven by client needs. Less than half felt integration was the way of the future. Corporate public relations practitioners were least familiar with the concept; they supported integrated marketing communications less than agency practitioners, but more than the educators. The percentage who said they integrated was almost the same as Northwestern University researchers found when they asked corporate marketing and advertising practitioners if they integrated. Corporate practitioners were most likely to say public relations was an equal partner with other communications disciplines in integrated marketing communications programs. The terminology -- calling the concept integrated "marketing" communications, versus referring to it as just integrated communications -- did not seem to be an issue. There was considerable disagreement between agency practitioners and educators on the roles of marketing and public relations. Most agency practitioners indicated public relations was a part of the marketing function; educators strongly disagreed. Smaller organizations (both client and agency) were more likely to integrate their public relations than were larger organizations. Likewise, smaller schools were more likely to teach public relations as part of an integrated program. Public relations agencies that were affiliated with advertising agencies were no more likely to integrate than those that were not; clients who used public relations agencies were no more likely to integrate than those that didn't. Finally, practitioners who practiced "marketing" public relations (product publicity, trade show support, etc.) were more likely to integrate than those who practiced "corporate" public relations (media relations, public affairs, etc.). en
dc.format.extent 6917443 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher Drake University en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Drake University Theses, School of Graduate Studies;1992
dc.subject Advertising en
dc.subject Marketing--Communications systems en
dc.subject Public relations en
dc.title Integrated Marketing Communications : The Public Relations Perspective en
dc.type Thesis en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account