Zoning Bias II: A Study of Oregon's Zoning Commission Composition Restrictions

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Anderson, Jerry L.
dc.date.accessioned 2007-04-06T15:32:26Z
dc.date.available 2007-04-06T15:32:26Z
dc.date.issued 2006
dc.identifier.citation 38 Urban Lawyer 63 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2092/531
dc.description.abstract This article summarizes an empirical survey of Oregon planning commissions, to determine whether Oregon's occupational restrictions on commission appointments are working. An earlier survey found that zoning boards in Iowa were heavily populated with white-collar occupations, with many having a direct or indirect connection to land development work. Oregon's occupational restrictions appear to have reduced the number of appointees who are tied to development, but the commissions are still skewed toward white-collar representation. The article concludes that legal restrictions should be tightened to achieve the goal of broader occupational distribution. en
dc.format.extent 415870 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher American Bar Association en
dc.subject zoning en
dc.subject urban planning en
dc.title Zoning Bias II: A Study of Oregon's Zoning Commission Composition Restrictions en
dc.type Article en

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Faculty publications [6]
    Publications and research submitted by the faculty members of the Law School.

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search


My Account