Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Jerry L.
dc.date.accessioned2007-04-06T15:32:26Z
dc.date.available2007-04-06T15:32:26Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citation38 Urban Lawyer 63en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2092/531
dc.description.abstractThis article summarizes an empirical survey of Oregon planning commissions, to determine whether Oregon's occupational restrictions on commission appointments are working. An earlier survey found that zoning boards in Iowa were heavily populated with white-collar occupations, with many having a direct or indirect connection to land development work. Oregon's occupational restrictions appear to have reduced the number of appointees who are tied to development, but the commissions are still skewed toward white-collar representation. The article concludes that legal restrictions should be tightened to achieve the goal of broader occupational distribution.en
dc.format.extent415870 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Bar Associationen
dc.subjectzoningen
dc.subjecturban planningen
dc.titleZoning Bias II: A Study of Oregon's Zoning Commission Composition Restrictionsen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Faculty publications
    Publications and research submitted by the faculty members of the Law School.

Show simple item record