Implementing State Educational Policy in Iowa: Voices from the Field

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Moore, Leslie Ann
dc.date.accessioned 2006-11-22T14:51:22Z
dc.date.available 2006-11-22T14:51:22Z
dc.date.issued 2003-05
dc.identifier.other 2003 .M781
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2092/459
dc.description v, 131 leaves. Advisor: Perry Johnston en
dc.description.abstract The problem: The problem of this qualitative policy implementation study was to describe and analyze what implementers understood as the intent of Iowa's Accountability for Student Learning Act as well as the processes and strategies used by small public school districts to implement this policy. This study also sought recommendations from implementers regarding improved design for future educational policy. Procedures: In-depth, one-on-one, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 teachers and administrators in three small, rural K-12 Iowa districts actively implementing HF 2272. Interview data were transcribed, coding schemes developed, and the constant comparative method was used to categorize data. Field notes and districts' relevant documents were reviewed. Data were analyzed by first developing a site report for each district. The researcher then looked across the site reports for themes. Discussion of the findings includes a consideration of the literature on accountability, standards-based reform, and policy implementation. Findings: 1) 2272 did not impact community relations, 2) the perceived intent was increased accountability to raise student achievement, 3) districts increased their use of data, 4) districts developed more formal assessment systems, 5) barriers included lack of time, unclear policy expectations, and the external nature of the mandate, 6) supports included their AEA and a culture of professional development and distributed leadership, 7) unintended consequences included increased educator workIoads, increased stress levels, and a sense of losing local control, and 8) educators recommended policymakers involve them in policy decisions. Conclusions: 1) active districts' culture/infrastructure assisted in implementation, 2) voluminous public reporting does not increase community engagement, 3) state and legislative consideration of implementation was lacking, 4) AEAs were crucial in capacity building, and 5) implementation was an intense, stressful, and not always productive process. Recommendations: 1) support Iowa's AEAs, 2) design flexible policy, 3) build capacity, 4) learn about policy instruments, and 5) involve educators in decisions that affect them. en
dc.format.extent 6948916 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher Drake University en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Drake University Dissertations, School of Education;2003
dc.subject Education and state--Iowa en
dc.subject Educational change--Iowa en
dc.subject Educational accountability--Iowa en
dc.subject Educational law and legislation--Iowa en
dc.subject Rural schools--Iowa en
dc.title Implementing State Educational Policy in Iowa: Voices from the Field en
dc.type Thesis en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account