Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCutler, Lois J.
dc.contributor.authorKane, Rosalie A.
dc.contributor.authorDegenholtz, Howard B.
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorGrant, Leslie
dc.date.accessioned2006-08-30T14:31:17Z
dc.date.available2006-08-30T14:31:17Z
dc.date.issued2006-02
dc.identifier.citationGerontologist Volume 46, Issue 1, February 2006, Pages 42-51en
dc.identifier.issn0016-9013
dc.identifier.otherhttp://gerontologist.gerontologyjournals.org/cgi/reprint/46/1/42
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2092/402
dc.descriptionMichael J. Miller is an Assistant Professor of Social and Administrative Sciences in Pharmacy (Pharmacy Practice) in the College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences at Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa. He can be contacted at michael.miller@drake.eduen
dc.description.abstractPurpose: We developed and tested theoretically derived procedures to observe physical environments experienced by nursing home residents at three nested levels: their rooms, the nursing unit, and the overall facility. Illustrating with selected descriptive results, in this article we discuss the development of the approach. Design and Methods: On the basis of published literature, existing instruments, and expert opinion about environmental elements that might affect quality of life, we developed separate observational checklists for the room and bath environment, unit environment, and facility environment. We trained 40 interviewers without specialized design experience to high interrater reliability with the room-level assessment. We used the three checklists to assess 1,988 resident room and bath environments, 131 nursing units, and 40 facilities in five states. From the data elements, we developed quantitative indices to describe the facilities according to environmentally relevant constructs such as function-enhancing features, life-enriching features, resident environmental controls, and personalization. Results: We reliably gathered data on a large number of environmental items at three environmental levels. Environments varied within and across facilities, and we noted many environmental deficits potentially relevant to resident quality of life. Implications: This research permits resident-specific data collection on physical environments and resident-level research using hierarchical analysis to examine the effects of specific environmental constellations. We describe practice and research implications for this approach.Copyright 2006 by The Gerontological Society of America.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services under a master contract to the University of Minnesota.en
dc.format.extent111366 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherGerontological Society of Americaen
dc.subjectRooms.en
dc.subjectNursing units.en
dc.subjectPersonalization.en
dc.subjectPrivacy.en
dc.subjectNursing homes--Evaluation.en
dc.subjectNursing homes--Quality control.en
dc.subjectNursing homes--Environmental conditions.en
dc.subjectNursing home patients.en
dc.title"Assessing and comparing physical environments for nursing home residents: Using new tools for greater research specificity"en
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Pharmacy Practice
    Publications and research submitted by the faculty members of the Department of Pharmacy Practice.

Show simple item record